_____________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainants: Employees
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 88-146 – June 8, 1990
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William Miller,
Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee; Thomas K. Saggau, Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America [UMWA) 1950 Benefit Plan and
Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
level of health benefits coverage for active Employees under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainants are classified Employees of the Respondent. The representative for the
Complainants has submitted a copy of the Respondent’s “Employee Benefit Program” which
indicates that benefit payments are subject to a $200 deductible for individual coverage and a
$600 maximum family deductible; thereafter, benefits are paid up to 90% of the cost of service if
a preferred provider Is used. If a preferred provider is not used, up to 80% of the cost of service
will be paid. In addition, the Respondent’s benefit plan provides a $20,000 life insurance benefit
and a $20,000 accidental death and dismemberment benefit. The representative for the
Complainants has also submitted copies of pay stubs and correspondence indicating that
Employees who elect coverage for their dependents have a health insurance premium deducted
from their paychecks. The representative for the Complainants contends that the Respondent’s
benefit plan does not comply with the provisions of the 1988 Wage Agreement and the Employer
Benefit Plan. In addition, the representative asks that the Respondent be required to reimburse
the Complainants the amount charged for their dependents’ coverage.
Dispute
Is the Respondent required to provide health benefits coverage for the Complainants at the level
prescribed by the 1988 Wage Agreement and to reimburse the Complainants for insurance
premiums deducted from their paychecks for dependent coverage?
Positions of the Parties
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-146
Page 2
Position of the Complainants: The Respondent’s benefit plan does not comply with the
provisions of the 1988 Wage Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan, and the Respondent
should be required to reimburse the Complainants for the premiums they were charged for
coverage for their dependents.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent states that it entered into an agreement with the
UMWA in June 1989 whereby the Union agreed to waive the health benefits provisions of the
Wage Agreement and, in exchange, the Respondent agreed to withdraw an unfair labor practice
charge filed with the National Labor Relations Board.
Pertinent Provisions
Article Xx Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1988 Wage Agreement provides in pertinent part:
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee benefit plan to provide,
implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other non-pension benefits for its
Employees covered by this Agreement as well as pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and
Trust, whose last signatory classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits
provided by the Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed
during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such plans.
Article I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of
1988, as amended from time to time and any successor agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the Employer,
eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A. (1) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-146
Page 3
Benefits under Article III shall be provided to any Employee who:
(1) is actively at work*
for the Employer on the effective date of the Wage
Agreement; or
(4) a new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day worked with
the Employer.
________
*
Actively at work includes an Employee of the Employer who was actively at work on January
31, 1988, and who returns to active work with the Employer two weeks after the effective date of
the Wage Agreement.
Article III A. (8) and B. (1) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide in pertinent part:
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
(8) Co-payments
Certain benefits provided in this Plan shall be subject to the co-payments
set forth below and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of the
Beneficiary. The Plan Administrator shall implement such procedures as
deemed appropriate to achieve the intent of these co-payments.
Co-payments for Health Benefits are established as follows:
Benefit Co-Payment
(a) Physician services as an out- Working group — $7.50 per
patient as set forth in section A visit up to a maximum of $150
(2) and physician visits in con- per 12-month period(*
) per
nection with the benefits set family.
forth in section A(3), paragraph Non-working Group — $5 per
(c) but only for pre- and post- visit up to a maximum of $100
natal visits if the physician per 12-month period(*
) per
charges separately for such visits family.
in addition to the charge for
delivery, and paragraphs (g)
through (m), paragraph (n) except
inpatient surgery, paragraph (o)
and section A(7) paragraph (f).
(b) Prescription drugs and insulin, $5 per prescription or refill
as set forth in section A(4) and up to a $5- maximum per
take-home drugs following hospital 12-month period(*
) per
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-146
Page 4
confinement as set forth in family.
section A(1)(a).
________
*
The 12-month periods shall begin on the following dates: March 27, 1988; March 27, 1989;
March 27, 1990; March 27, 1991 and March 27, 1992.
Article III. a. (1) (a),(b) and (c) of the Employer Benefit Plan Provide:
B. Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance
(1) Active Employees
Life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance will be provided
for Employees, as described in Article II, Sections A and C (3), in accordance
with the following schedule:
(a) Upon the death of an Employee due to other than violent, external
and accidental means, life insurance in the amount of $35,000 will be paid
to the Employee’s named beneficiary.
(b) Subject to (d) below, upon the death of an Employee due solely to
violent, external and accidental means as the result of an injury occurring
while insured and on or’ after February 1, 1988, life insurance in the
amount of $70,000 will be paid to the Employee’s named beneficiary.
(c) If an Employee shall lose two or more members due to violent,
external and accidental means as the result of an injury occurring while
insured and on or’ after February 1, 1988, such Employee shall receive a
$35,000 dismemberment benefit. If an Employee shall lose one member’
due solely to violent, external and accidental means as the result of an
injury occurring while insured and on or after February 1, 1988, such
Employee shall receive a $17,500 dismemberment benefit. A member for
the purpose of the above is (i) a hand at or above the wrist, (ii) a foot at or
above the ankle or (iii) total loss of vision of one eye.
Discussion
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1988 Wage Agreement requires each signatory Employer to
“establish and maintain an Employee benefit plan to provide, implemented through an insurance
carrier(s), health and other non-pension benefits for its Employees…” The Wage Agreement
stipulates that benefits provided by the Employer pursuant to such Plan shall be guaranteed
during the term of the Agreement at levels set forth in such Plan.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-146
Page 5
Article III. A. (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides that certain benefits provided under the
Plan shall be subject to co-payments of $5.00 or $7.50, and such co-payments shall be the
responsibility of the beneficiary until the specified maximum yearly amount is reached ($150 for
physician services and 550 for prescriptions per family of a working miner). In addition, Article
III. B.(1) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides for a life insurance benefit in the amount of
$35,000, an accidental death benefit in the amount of $70,000, and dismemberment benefits of
$17,500 for the loss of one member and $35,000, for the loss of two or more members. The
Respondent’s benefit plan subjects benefits payments to deductibles and co-insurance payments
which are inconsistent with the terms of the Plan. The Respondent’s plan also provides life and
accidental death and dismemberment benefits which are inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.
The Respondent in this case contends that the Union agreed to wave the death benefits
provisions of the Wage Agreement and to permit the Respondent to continue its existing health
coverage plan for the duration of the contract. The Complainant’s representative states that the
Union never entered into an agreement with the Respondent that would provide for a lower level
of benefits than that set forth in the Wage Agreement. Although a letter dated June 13, 1989
indicates that counsel for the Respondent was writing to the Complainant’s representative to
confirm such an agreement, no evidence that such an agreement was actually executed by the
parties has been submitted. Levels of benefit, to be provided to Employees, Pensioners and their
dependents and survivors are established through collective bargaining and may not be
unilaterally handed. Absent evidence of a bargained for agreement to the contrary, the Trustees
conclude that the Respondent is required to provide health benefits coverage for the
Complainants and their eligible dependents at the level specified in the Wage Agreement and the
Employer Benefit Plan.
The Complainants have asked that the Respondent be required to reimburse them for health
insurance premiums which the Respondent deducted from the Complainants’ pay for dependent
coverage. Article II D. of the Plan provides health benefits coverage to an Employee’s eligible
dependents as specified therein. There are no provisions under the 1988 Wage Agreement or the
Employer Benefit Plan which require an Employee to pay premiums for an eligible dependent’s
coverage. Inasmuch as the Respondent’s deduction of premiums from the Complainants’ pay is
inconsistent with the express provisions of the 1988 Wage Agreement and the Employer Benefit
Plan, such premiums must now be refunded to the complainants.
Opinion of the Trustees
The Respondent’s health coverage plan is inconsistent with the express provisions of the 1988
Wage Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan. The Respondent is required to provide health
benefits coverage for the complainants and their eligible dependents at the level specified in the
Employer Benefit Plan, and to provide reimbursement for premiums paid by the Complainants to
obtain coverage for their eligible dependents.